// head_to_head
Ox Alpha vs Inkling
Published LiveBench scores across all seven categories, live list pricing, context windows, and the measured cost of a point of capability — for both models, side by side.
Inkling scores higher, Ox Alpha costs less — it depends on your workload.
Inkling is ahead by 2.7 points overall, and Ox Alpha lists at a lower blended price. Whether 2.7 points is worth that depends on how much a wrong answer costs you. Ox Alpha also leads on measured cost per point of capability, at $0.0000 per point.
stealth
Ox Alpha
- Blended / 1M
- Free
- Context
- 1.0M
- Released
- Aug 20, 2026
- Overall score
- 69.2
thinkingmachines
Inkling
- Blended / 1M
- $1.72
- Context
- 1.0M
- Released
- Jul 17, 2026
- Overall score
- 71.9
Specs and pricing
| Metric | Ox Alpha | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench overall Mean of the seven LiveBench category scores, 0–100. Higher is better. | 69.2 | 71.9win |
| Cost per point Measured benchmark spend divided by overall score — dollars per point of capability. | $0.0000win | $0.1766 |
| Blended price / 1M 3:1 input:output mix, the usual shape of production traffic. | Freewin | $1.72 |
| Input price / 1M | Freewin | $0.950 |
| Output price / 1M | Freewin | $4.05 |
| Cached input / 1M Price of an input token served from the prompt cache, where the provider publishes one. | — | $0.160 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output tokens | 131K | 262Kwin |
Benchmarks by category
An overall score averages away the thing you probably care about. These are the seven LiveBench categories scored separately — Ox Alpha on top, Inkling below, both out of 100.
What each one costs to run
Per-token prices are hard to feel. These are monthly list costs for both models across five workload shapes, using each provider's published cached-input rate where there is one.
| Workload | Ox Alpha | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Support chatbot 1.2K in / 400 out × 200K requests | $0/mo | $495.12/mo |
| RAG assistant 8K in / 600 out × 100K requests | $0/mo | $687.00/mo |
| Coding agent 40K in / 4K out × 20K requests | $0/mo | $641.60/mo |
| Document extraction 20K in / 1.5K out × 50K requests | $0/mo | $1214.25/mo |
| Bulk classification 500 in / 20 out × 5M requests | $0/mo | $2385.00/mo |
Which should you pick?
You are running this at volume
Ox Alpha
Lowest measured cost per point of capability at $0.0000 per point — the gap compounds with every request.
Quality matters more than the bill
Inkling
Highest overall LiveBench score of the two at 71.9.
The workload is coding or agentic work
Ox Alpha
Leads on agentic coding — 52.6 against 49.4.
Ox Alpha vs Inkling FAQ
Which is better, Ox Alpha or Inkling?
Inkling scores higher, Ox Alpha costs less — it depends on your workload. Inkling is ahead by 2.7 points overall, and Ox Alpha lists at a lower blended price. Whether 2.7 points is worth that depends on how much a wrong answer costs you. Ox Alpha also leads on measured cost per point of capability, at $0.0000 per point.
Is Ox Alpha cheaper than Inkling?
Ox Alpha is cheaper. On a 3:1 input:output blend, Ox Alpha lists at Free per million tokens and Inkling at $1.72. Input and output are priced separately — Ox Alpha charges Free in and Free out, Inkling charges $0.950 and $4.05 — so the model that looks cheaper flips depending on how output-heavy your workload is.
Ox Alpha vs Inkling: which scores higher on benchmarks?
Ox Alpha scores 69.2 and Inkling scores 71.9 overall on LiveBench, the mean of its seven categories. That is a 2.7-point lead for Inkling. Category scores differ from the overall figure — a model can lead on reasoning and trail on coding, which the per-category table above breaks out.
Which gives better value for money, Ox Alpha or Inkling?
Ox Alpha. Cost per point divides the measured dollars LiveBench spent running the benchmark by the score it earned, so it captures something token pricing misses: a reasoning model can emit many times more tokens than its per-token rate suggests. Ox Alpha works out at $0.0000 per point and Inkling at $0.1766.
Does Ox Alpha or Inkling have a bigger context window?
They are effectively the same — 1.0M for Ox Alpha and 1.0M for Inkling.
Do Ox Alpha and Inkling support prompt caching?
Inkling publishes a cached-input rate of $0.160 per million tokens against a full input rate of $0.950. The catalogue lists no separate cached rate for Ox Alpha, which means the provider does not price it separately here — not that caching is unavailable.
Related comparisons
How these numbers are produced
- Price — provider list price from OpenRouter, refreshed every 15 minutes. “Blended” is a 3:1 input:output mix.
- Scores — LiveBench release 2026-06-25, using their own category map. Each model shows its strongest published run. A blank means “not evaluated”, never “bad”.
- Cost per point — the measured dollars LiveBench spent on the run, divided by the score it earned.
- “Win” — awarded only past a threshold: one full point on a benchmark score, 10% on a price, 25% on a context window. Anything tighter reports as a tie, because effort settings alone move a LiveBench score by more than that.
Published benchmarks rank models on someone else's tasks. Before committing, see LLM & agent evaluation for building an eval on your own.