// head_to_head

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Inkling

Published LiveBench scores across all seven categories, live list pricing, context windows, and the measured cost of a point of capability — for both models, side by side.

OpenRouter + LiveBenchAll comparisonsFull leaderboard

Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher, Inkling costs less — it depends on your workload.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is ahead by 1.1 points overall, and Inkling lists 3.5× cheaper per blended million tokens. Whether 1.1 points is worth that depends on how much a wrong answer costs you.

anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Blended / 1M
$6.00
Context
1M
Released
Feb 17, 2026
Overall score
73.0
reasoningtool callingimage inputfile inputprompt caching

thinkingmachines

Inkling

Blended / 1M
$1.72
Context
1.0M
Released
Jul 17, 2026
Overall score
71.9
reasoningtool callingimage inputaudio inputprompt caching

Specs and pricing

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6Inkling
LiveBench overall

Mean of the seven LiveBench category scores, 0–100. Higher is better.

73.0win71.9
Cost per point

Measured benchmark spend divided by overall score — dollars per point of capability.

$0.1561$0.1766
Blended price / 1M

3:1 input:output mix, the usual shape of production traffic.

$6.00$1.72win
Input price / 1M$3.00$0.950win
Output price / 1M$15.00$4.05win
Cached input / 1M

Price of an input token served from the prompt cache, where the provider publishes one.

$0.300$0.160win
Context window1M1.0M
Max output tokens128K262Kwin

Benchmarks by category

An overall score averages away the thing you probably care about. These are the seven LiveBench categories scored separately — Claude Sonnet 4.6 on top, Inkling below, both out of 100.

Agentic coding
42.6
49.4
Coding
79.3
71.0
Reasoning
84.8
78.3
Mathematics
87.0
88.4
Data analysis
77.9
72.8
Language
76.1
73.5
Instruction following
63.2
70.1

What each one costs to run

Per-token prices are hard to feel. These are monthly list costs for both models across five workload shapes, using each provider's published cached-input rate where there is one.

WorkloadClaude Sonnet 4.6Inkling
Support chatbot

1.2K in / 400 out × 200K requests

$1725.60/mo$495.12/mo
RAG assistant

8K in / 600 out × 100K requests

$2220.00/mo$687.00/mo
Coding agent

40K in / 4K out × 20K requests

$2088.00/mo$641.60/mo
Document extraction

20K in / 1.5K out × 50K requests

$3990.00/mo$1214.25/mo
Bulk classification

500 in / 20 out × 5M requests

$7650.00/mo$2385.00/mo
Run these two through the cost calculator

Which should you pick?

Quality matters more than the bill

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Highest overall LiveBench score of the two at 73.0.

The workload is coding or agentic work

Inkling

Leads on agentic coding — 49.4 against 42.6.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Inkling FAQ

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Inkling?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher, Inkling costs less — it depends on your workload. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is ahead by 1.1 points overall, and Inkling lists 3.5× cheaper per blended million tokens. Whether 1.1 points is worth that depends on how much a wrong answer costs you.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 cheaper than Inkling?

Inkling is cheaper. On a 3:1 input:output blend, Claude Sonnet 4.6 lists at $6.00 per million tokens and Inkling at $1.72 — Inkling is 3.5× cheaper. Input and output are priced separately — Claude Sonnet 4.6 charges $3.00 in and $15.00 out, Inkling charges $0.950 and $4.05 — so the model that looks cheaper flips depending on how output-heavy your workload is.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Inkling: which scores higher on benchmarks?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 73.0 and Inkling scores 71.9 overall on LiveBench, the mean of its seven categories. That is a 1.1-point lead for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Category scores differ from the overall figure — a model can lead on reasoning and trail on coding, which the per-category table above breaks out.

Which gives better value for money, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Inkling?

They are close. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $0.1561 per point of overall capability and Inkling costs $0.1766, a difference small enough that workload shape will matter more than the rate.

Does Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Inkling have a bigger context window?

They are effectively the same — 1M for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and 1.0M for Inkling.

Do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Inkling support prompt caching?

Both publish a cached-input rate: $0.300 per million for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and $0.160 for Inkling, against full input rates of $3.00 and $0.950. On a workload with a long stable prefix — a system prompt, a tool schema, a retrieved corpus — that changes the economics more than the headline price does.

Related comparisons

How these numbers are produced

  • Price — provider list price from OpenRouter, refreshed every 15 minutes. “Blended” is a 3:1 input:output mix.
  • ScoresLiveBench release 2026-06-25, using their own category map. Each model shows its strongest published run. A blank means “not evaluated”, never “bad”.
  • Cost per point — the measured dollars LiveBench spent on the run, divided by the score it earned.
  • “Win” — awarded only past a threshold: one full point on a benchmark score, 10% on a price, 25% on a context window. Anything tighter reports as a tie, because effort settings alone move a LiveBench score by more than that.

Published benchmarks rank models on someone else's tasks. Before committing, see LLM & agent evaluation for building an eval on your own.