pvakati-tech.ai

// head_to_head

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Published LiveBench scores across all seven categories, live list pricing, context windows, and the measured cost of a point of capability — for both models, side by side.

OpenRouter + LiveBenchAll comparisonsFull leaderboard

Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime are priced within ~10% of each other.

Qwen3.8 Max Prime does not have a published LiveBench run, so this comparison covers price, context and declared capabilities only. A missing score means "not evaluated", not "worse" — the right way to separate these two is an eval on your own workload.

moonshotai

Kimi K3

Blended / 1M
$6.00
Context
1.0M
Released
Jul 16, 2026
Overall score
79.2
reasoningtool callingimage inputvideo inputprompt caching

qwen

Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Blended / 1M
$6.00
Context
1M
Released
Sep 23, 2026
Overall score
Not evaluated
reasoningtool callingimage inputvideo inputprompt caching

Specs and pricing

MetricKimi K3Qwen3.8 Max Prime
LiveBench overall

Mean of the seven LiveBench category scores, 0–100. Higher is better.

79.2—
Cost per point

Measured benchmark spend divided by overall score — dollars per point of capability.

$0.1909—
Blended price / 1M

3:1 input:output mix, the usual shape of production traffic.

$6.00$6.00
Input price / 1M$3.00win$4.00
Output price / 1M$15.00$12.00win
Cached input / 1M

Price of an input token served from the prompt cache, where the provider publishes one.

$0.300win$0.500
Context window1.0M1M
Max output tokens944Kwin131K

Benchmarks by category

An overall score averages away the thing you probably care about. These are the seven LiveBench categories scored separately — Kimi K3 on top, Qwen3.8 Max Prime below, both out of 100.

Agentic coding
62.2
—
Coding
81.4
—
Reasoning
90.7
—
Mathematics
84.4
—
Data analysis
78.7
—
Language
85.5
—
Instruction following
71.4
—

What each one costs to run

Per-token prices are hard to feel. These are monthly list costs for both models across five workload shapes, using each provider's published cached-input rate where there is one.

WorkloadKimi K3Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Support chatbot

1.2K in / 400 out × 200K requests

$1,726/mo$1,668/mo
RAG assistant

8K in / 600 out × 100K requests

$2,220/mo$2,520/mo
Coding agent

40K in / 4K out × 20K requests

$2,088/mo$2,200/mo
Document extraction

20K in / 1.5K out × 50K requests

$3,990/mo$4,725/mo
Bulk classification

500 in / 20 out × 5M requests

$7,650/mo$9,450/mo
Run these two through the cost calculator

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime FAQ

Which is better, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime are priced within ~10% of each other. Qwen3.8 Max Prime does not have a published LiveBench run, so this comparison covers price, context and declared capabilities only. A missing score means "not evaluated", not "worse" — the right way to separate these two is an eval on your own workload.

Is Kimi K3 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

They cost about the same. Both land near $6.00 per million tokens on a 3:1 input:output blend, so price is unlikely to be the deciding factor between them.

Does Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime have a bigger context window?

They are effectively the same — 1.0M for Kimi K3 and 1M for Qwen3.8 Max Prime.

Do Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime support prompt caching?

Both publish a cached-input rate: $0.300 per million for Kimi K3 and $0.500 for Qwen3.8 Max Prime, against full input rates of $3.00 and $4.00. On a workload with a long stable prefix — a system prompt, a tool schema, a retrieved corpus — that changes the economics more than the headline price does.

Related comparisons

How these numbers are produced

  • Price — provider list price from OpenRouter, refreshed every 15 minutes. “Blended” is a 3:1 input:output mix.
  • Scores — LiveBench release 2026-06-25, using their own category map. Each model shows its strongest published run. A blank means “not evaluated”, never “bad”.
  • Cost per point — the measured dollars LiveBench spent on the run, divided by the score it earned.
  • “Win” — awarded only past a threshold: one full point on a benchmark score, 10% on a price, 25% on a context window. Anything tighter reports as a tie, because effort settings alone move a LiveBench score by more than that.

Published benchmarks rank models on someone else's tasks. Before committing, see LLM & agent evaluation for building an eval on your own.